Course Syllabus
Obiettivi
Comprensione delle pricipali sfide (acidificazione, estrazione di petrolio e gas, pesca eccessiva, attività minerarie, bio-propsecting, geoingegneria) per la gestione dei fondali marini profondi.
Comprensione delle principali questioni relative allo studio degli oceani e degli spazi transnazionali secondo la prospettiva delle geopolitica critica.
Capacità avanzata di analisi critica e di comprensione della letteratura scientifica e delle narrative relative agli oceani, e delle dinamiche geopolitiche in atto per la conquista del sea-power.
Abilità di condurre studi e ricerche interdisciplinari.
Contenuti sintetici
La prima parte del corso riguarda la geopolitica dei fondali marini profondi, e si focalizza in particolare su definizioni, valori, diritti di proprietà, accesso, stato di salute e futura condizione dei fondali marini, una dimensione degli oceani ricca di riserva e sempre più contesa e contestata.
Dopo una breve introduzione sugli approcci più recenti alla geografia politica e alla geopolitica critica, il corso si concentra dapprima sulla rappresentazione storica dell’oceano come “spazio politico e sociale” e su come il mare possa essere inquadrato dal discorso geopolitico internazionale, in relazione ai processi di territorializzazione, di geo-power e di extra-territorialità degli spazi marini.
Programma esteso
Marco Grasso
Part I – Geopolitics of deep oceans and environmental justice
The tragedy of the commons
Harvesting the Commons: the Oceanic frontier and the devolution of the seas
Deep oceans: potential and problems
Deep seabed governance: the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS) and the International Seabed Authority (ISA)
The deep seabed governance: the mining regime
Claiming the commons: Sovereignty and the deep seabed
Claiming the commons: the Arctic deep seabed
Protecting the commons
Climate change and the future of the deep oceans
Elena dell’Agnese
Parte II - Political geography of the sea**
The political geography of the sea: a classical approach (maritime boundaries and Law of the Sea, transport and trade, strategy and warfare)
A (critical) political geo-graphy of the sea? thinking about the sea / representing the sea / exploiting the “geopolitical features” of the sea
Geo-graphy and the power of representation /Dividing (and naming) the ocean sea: the East Sea/ Sea of Japan issue
The territorialisation of the sea /Territorial claims and islands disputes: the Dokdo-Takeshima issue
Geographical definitions and island disputes: the Sankeku-Diaoyu issue/ climate change and vanishing islands/reefs: Okininotori: a shima, or a reef’?
A classical approach to the geopolitics of the sea/ the myth of sea power: A.T. Mahan theoretical positions / China as a maritime power and the South China Sea competition (Spratly, Paracel and more)
Sea power, sea nodes and islands as U.S. bases: The Hawai’i and Pearl Harbor, Midway and Wake, Guam
Sea power, sea nodes and islands as overseas U.S. bases/ bases of empire and lily pads: Guantanamo, Micronesia and Marshall Islands, Okinawa, Diego Garcia
LSMPAs (Large Scale Maritime Protected Areas): conservation or geopolitics?
Extra-territoriality and Cruise tourism as an example of globalization
Prerequisiti
Adeguata conoscenza delle scienze sociali rilevanti (geografia, scienza politica, economia, diritto, sociologia).
Capacità di lavoro secondo prospettive multidisciplinari e interdisciplinari.
Modalità didattica
Lectures
Materiale didattico
Marco Grasso
Part I – Geopolitics of deep oceans and environmental justice
Study material
Hannigan, J. (2016). The Geopolitics of Deep Oceans. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
Scientific articles and policy briefs pointed indicated below. They are all accessible from within the campus; for accessing them from outside the campus see here:
https://www.biblio.unimib.it/it/risorse/accesso-alle-risorse-remoto
The tragedy of the commons
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., Grégoire, M., Chavez, F. P., Conley, D. J., ... & Jacinto, G. S. (2018). Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science, 359(6371).
See also, The Atlantic, ‘A Foreboding Similarity in Today’s Oceans and a 94-Million-Year-Old Catastrophe’,
[https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/01/suffocating-oceans/550415/]
Harvesting the Commons: the Oceanic frontier and the devolution of the seas
Hanningan (2016): Introduction and Chapter 1
Van Dover, C. L. (2011). Tighten regulations on deep-sea mining. Nature, 470(7332), 31-33.
Sielen, A. B. (2013). The devolution of the seas: the consequences of oceanic destruction. Foreign Affairs, 92(6), 124-132.
Diaz, R. J., and Rosenberg, R. (2008). Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science, 321(5891), 926-929.
Deep oceans: potential and problems
Thurber, A. R., Sweetman, A. K., Narayanaswamy, B. E., Jones, D. O. B., Ingels, J., & Hansman, R. L. (2014). Ecosystem function and services provided by the deep sea. Biogeosciences, 11(14), 3941-3963.
Armstrong, C. W., Foley, N. S., Tinch, R., & van den Hove, S. (2012). Services from the deep: Steps towards valuation of deep sea goods and services. Ecosystem Services, 2, 2-13.
Mengerink, K. J., Van Dover, C. L., Ardron, J., Baker, M., Escobar-Briones, E., Gjerde, K., ... & Sutton, T. (2014). A call for deep-ocean stewardship. Science, 344(6185), 696-698.
Deep seabed governance: the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS) and the International Seabed Authority (ISA)
Hanningan (2016): Chapter 2
Wolfrum, R. (2008). Legitimacy of international law and the exercise of administrative functions: the Example of the International Seabed Authority, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and International Fisheries Organizations. German Law Journal, 8, 2039-2060. ONLY SECTION C, pp. 20145-2054.
Kim, B. M. (2014). Governance of the global commons: the deep seabed, the Antarctic, outer space. KIEP World Economy, 4(29).
Guntrip, E. (2003). The Common Heritage of Mankind: an adequate regime for managing the deep seabed. Melb. J. Int'l L., 4, 376.
Deep seabed governance: the mining regime
Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K. M., and Ardron, J. A. (2017). Conserving the common heritage of humankind–Options for the deep-seabed mining regime. Marine Policy, 78, 150-157.
Boetius, A., & Haeckel, M. (2018). Mind the seafloor. Science, 359(6371), 34-36.
Claiming the commons: Sovereignty and the deep seabed
Hanningan (2016): Chapter 3
Werner, W., & Aalberts, T. (2016). Mastering the globe: Law, sovereignty and the commons of mankind. In The Politics of Globality since 1945 (pp. 89-105). Routledge [A not formatted version sis available here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/38711813/Globality_-Mastering_the_Globe-_Aalberts_Werner_final.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1554202086&Signature=x2rNIgeJ23yfX3veUh4mCYP8xc0%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DMastering_the_Globe_Law_Sovereignty_and.pdf]
Claiming the commons: the Arctic deep seabed
Borgerson, S. (2013). The coming Arctic boom: as the ice melts, the region heats up. Foreign Affairs, 92, 76.
Berkman, P. A., & Young, O. R. (2009). Governance and environmental change in the Arctic Ocean. Science, 324(5925), 339-340.
Rothwell, D. R. (2013, April). The Law of the Sea and Arctic Governance. In ASIL Annual Meeting Proceedings, 107, pp. 272-275. American Society for International Law.
Protecting the commons
Hanningan (2016): Chapter 4
The Economists, ‘The tragedy of the high seas’,
[https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21596942-new-management-needed-planets-most-important-common-resource-tragedy-high]
Climate change and the future of the deep oceans
Hanningan (2016): Conclusions
McGee, J., Brent, K., & Burns, W. (2018). Geoengineering the oceans: an emerging frontier in international climate change governance. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 10(1), 67-80.
Elena dell’Agnese
Parte II - Political geography of the sea**
1. The political geography of the sea: a classical approach (maritime boundaries and Law of the Sea, transport and trade, strategy and warfare)
Glassner M.I., The new political geography of the sea, Political Geography Quarterly, 1986, pp. 6-8
A (critical) political geo-graphy of the sea? (thinking about the sea / representing the sea / exploiting the “geopolitical features” of the sea)
Steinberg, P.E. (1999) Navigating to Multiple Horizons: Toward a Geography of Ocean-Space, The Professional Geographer, 51, 3, pp. 366-375
2. Geo-graphy and the power of representation: The geo-graphy of the ocean sea / Dividing (and naming) the ocean sea
Steinberg, P.E. (1999), Lines of divison, lines of connection: Stewardship in the world ocean, Geographical Review 89, 2, pp. 254-264
The East sea/ Sea of Japan case study
Chi Sang-Hyun, One feature, two names and many issues: The political geographies of naming the sea between Korea and Japan, eastsea1994.org/data/bbsData/14912842071.pdf
3. The “political geography of the sea”: the territorialisation of the sea
Territorial claims and islands disputes (Dokdo-Takeshima)
Suk Kyoon Kim (2008), Understanding Maritime Disputes in Northeast Asia: Issues and Nature, Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L., pp. 213-247
4. Geographical definitions and island disputes (Sankeku-Diaoyu)
McCormack G. (2013), Much Ado over Small Islands: The Sino-Japanese Confrontation over Senkaku/Diaoyu, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 11, 21, pp. 1-20
climate change and vanishing islands/reefs (Okininotori: a shima, or a reef’?)
Yamamoto L., Esteban M. (2010), Vanishing Island States and sovereignty, Ocean & Coastal Management 53, pp. 1–9
5. A classical approach to the geopolitics of the sea: the myth of sea power (A.T. Mahan)
Sumida J. (1999): Alfred Thayer Mahan, geopolitician, Journal of Strategic Studies, 22, 2-3, 39-62
China as a maritime power and the South China Sea competition
Nohara J.J. (2017) Sea power as a dominant paradigm: the rise of China’s new strategic identity, Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 6, 2, pp. 210-232
6. Sea power, sea nodes and islands as U.S. bases
The Hawai’i and Pearl Harbor, Midway and Wake, Guam
Vine D., (2015) Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World, Metropolitan Books, New York, Introduction, Capp. 1 and 2
7. Sea power, sea nodes and islands as overseas U.S. bases: bases of empire and lily pads
Guantanamo, Micronesia and Marshall Islands, Okinawa, Diego Garcia
Vine D., (2015) Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World, Metropolitan Books, New York, Cap 3.
8. LSMPAs (Large Scale Maritime Protected Areas): conservation or geopolitics?
Sand P.H. (2012), ‘Marine protected areas’ off UK overseas territories: comparing the South Orkneys Shelf and the Chagos Archipelago, The Geographical Journal, 178, 3, pp. 201–207
Leenhardt P., Cazalet B., Salvat B., Claudet J., Feral F. (2013). The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics? Ocean & Coastal Management, 85, pp. 112-118
9. Extra-territoriality and Cruise tourism as an example of globalization
Hall C.M., (2001), Trends in ocean and coastal tourism: the end of the last frontier? Ocean & Coastal Management, 44, pp. 601-618
Periodo di erogazione dell'insegnamento
Secondo semestre
Modalità di verifica del profitto e valutazione
Marco Grasso
**Parte I - Geopolitics of deep oceans and environmental justice
Paper 2000-2500 and oral dicussions
Elena dell'Agnese
Parte II - Political geography of the sea
Paper 2000-2500 and oral dicussions
Orario di ricevimento
Marco Grasso
su appuntamento, di persona o online
Stanza U7/3117 terzo piano
Elena dell'Agnese
su appuntamento, di persona o online
Stanza 358/U7 terzo piano
Sustainable Development Goals
Aims
An understanding of the major challenges (acidification, oil and gas drilling, overfishing, and, in the long term, deep-sea mining, bioprospecting, and geo-engineering) posed by the deep seabed.
Understanding of the main questions raised by studying oceanic and transnational spaces in a critical geopolitics perspective.
An advanced ability to critically analyze and interrogate scholarship and discourse framing the oceans, and the geopolitical dynamics underway to conquer sea-power.
An engagement with the challenges of inter-disciplinary study and research.
Contents
The first part relates to the geopolitics of the deep see and in particular it focuses on the definition, value, ownership, access, health and future state of the resource-rich and highly contested sub-surface ocean.
Then, after a short introduction to the most recent theoretical approaches to political geography and critical geopolitics, the course focuses first on the historical representation of the ocean as a "political and social space" and on how the sea can be framed by international geopolitical discourse, in relation to the processes of territorialisation, geo-power and extra-territoriality of marine spaces.
Detailed program
Marco Grasso
Part I – Geopolitics of deep oceans and environmental justice
The tragedy of the commons
Harvesting the Commons: the Oceanic frontier and the devolution of the seas
Deep oceans: potential and problems
Deep seabed governance: the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS) and the International Seabed Authority (ISA)
The deep seabed governance: the mining regime
Claiming the commons: Sovereignty and the deep seabed
Claiming the commons: the Arctic deep seabed
Protecting the commons
Climate change and the future of the deep oceans
Elena dell’Agnese
Part II - Political geography of the sea**
The political geography of the sea: a classical approach (maritime boundaries and Law of the Sea, transport and trade, strategy and warfare)
A (critical) political geo-graphy of the sea? thinking about the sea / representing the sea / exploiting the “geopolitical features” of the sea
Geo-graphy and the power of representation /Dividing (and naming) the ocean sea: the East Sea/ Sea of Japan issue
The territorialisation of the sea /Territorial claims and islands disputes: the Dokdo-Takeshima issue
Geographical definitions and island disputes: the Sankeku-Diaoyu issue/ climate change and vanishing islands/reefs: Okininotori: a shima, or a reef’?
A classical approach to the geopolitics of the sea/ the myth of sea power: A.T. Mahan theoretical positions / China as a maritime power and the South China Sea competition (Spratly, Paracel and more)
Sea power, sea nodes and islands as U.S. bases: The Hawai’i and Pearl Harbor, Midway and Wake, Guam
Sea power, sea nodes and islands as overseas U.S. bases/ bases of empire and lily pads: Guantanamo, Micronesia and Marshall Islands, Okinawa, Diego Garcia
LSMPAs (Large Scale Maritime Protected Areas): conservation or geopolitics?
Extra-territoriality and Cruise tourism as an example of globalization
Prerequisites
An adequate grasp of the perspectives of the relevant social sciences (geography, politics, economics, law, and sociology).
Capacity of working according to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives.
Teaching form
Lectures
Textbook and teaching resource
Marco Grasso
Part I – Geopolitics of deep oceans and environmental justice
Study material
Hannigan, J. (2016). The Geopolitics of Deep Oceans. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
Scientific articles and policy briefs pointed indicated below. They are all accessible from within the campus; for accessing them from outside the campus see here:
https://www.biblio.unimib.it/it/risorse/accesso-alle-risorse-remoto
The tragedy of the commons
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
Breitburg, D., Levin, L. A., Oschlies, A., Grégoire, M., Chavez, F. P., Conley, D. J., ... & Jacinto, G. S. (2018). Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science, 359(6371).
See also, The Atlantic, ‘A Foreboding Similarity in Today’s Oceans and a 94-Million-Year-Old Catastrophe’,
[https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/01/suffocating-oceans/550415/]
Harvesting the Commons: the Oceanic frontier and the devolution of the seas
Hanningan (2016): Introduction and Chapter 1
Van Dover, C. L. (2011). Tighten regulations on deep-sea mining. Nature, 470(7332), 31-33.
Sielen, A. B. (2013). The devolution of the seas: the consequences of oceanic destruction. Foreign Affairs, 92(6), 124-132.
Diaz, R. J., and Rosenberg, R. (2008). Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science, 321(5891), 926-929.
Deep oceans: potential and problems
Thurber, A. R., Sweetman, A. K., Narayanaswamy, B. E., Jones, D. O. B., Ingels, J., & Hansman, R. L. (2014). Ecosystem function and services provided by the deep sea. Biogeosciences, 11(14), 3941-3963.
Armstrong, C. W., Foley, N. S., Tinch, R., & van den Hove, S. (2012). Services from the deep: Steps towards valuation of deep sea goods and services. Ecosystem Services, 2, 2-13.
Mengerink, K. J., Van Dover, C. L., Ardron, J., Baker, M., Escobar-Briones, E., Gjerde, K., ... & Sutton, T. (2014). A call for deep-ocean stewardship. Science, 344(6185), 696-698.
Deep seabed governance: the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS) and the International Seabed Authority (ISA)
Hanningan (2016): Chapter 2
Wolfrum, R. (2008). Legitimacy of international law and the exercise of administrative functions: the Example of the International Seabed Authority, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and International Fisheries Organizations. German Law Journal, 8, 2039-2060. ONLY SECTION C, pp. 20145-2054.
Kim, B. M. (2014). Governance of the global commons: the deep seabed, the Antarctic, outer space. KIEP World Economy, 4(29).
Guntrip, E. (2003). The Common Heritage of Mankind: an adequate regime for managing the deep seabed. Melb. J. Int'l L., 4, 376.
Deep seabed governance: the mining regime
Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K. M., and Ardron, J. A. (2017). Conserving the common heritage of humankind–Options for the deep-seabed mining regime. Marine Policy, 78, 150-157.
Boetius, A., & Haeckel, M. (2018). Mind the seafloor. Science, 359(6371), 34-36.
Claiming the commons: Sovereignty and the deep seabed
Hanningan (2016): Chapter 3
Werner, W., & Aalberts, T. (2016). Mastering the globe: Law, sovereignty and the commons of mankind. In The Politics of Globality since 1945 (pp. 89-105). Routledge [A not formatted version sis available here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/38711813/Globality_-Mastering_the_Globe-_Aalberts_Werner_final.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1554202086&Signature=x2rNIgeJ23yfX3veUh4mCYP8xc0%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DMastering_the_Globe_Law_Sovereignty_and.pdf]
Claiming the commons: the Arctic deep seabed
Borgerson, S. (2013). The coming Arctic boom: as the ice melts, the region heats up. Foreign Affairs, 92, 76.
Berkman, P. A., & Young, O. R. (2009). Governance and environmental change in the Arctic Ocean. Science, 324(5925), 339-340.
Rothwell, D. R. (2013, April). The Law of the Sea and Arctic Governance. In ASIL Annual Meeting Proceedings, 107, pp. 272-275. American Society for International Law.
Protecting the commons
Hanningan (2016): Chapter 4
The Economists, ‘The tragedy of the high seas’,
[https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21596942-new-management-needed-planets-most-important-common-resource-tragedy-high]
Climate change and the future of the deep oceans
Hanningan (2016): Conclusions
McGee, J., Brent, K., & Burns, W. (2018). Geoengineering the oceans: an emerging frontier in international climate change governance. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 10(1), 67-80.
Elena dell’Agnese
Part II - Political geography of the sea**
1. Political geography, geopolitics, critical geopolitics.
The political geography of the sea: a classical approach (maritime boundaries and Law of the Sea, transport and trade, strategy and warfare)
Glassner M.I., The new political geography of the sea, Political Geography Quarterly, 1986, pp. 6-8
A (critical) political geo-graphy of the sea? (thinking about the sea / representing the sea / exploiting the “geopolitical features” of the sea)
Steinberg, P.E. (1999) Navigating to Multiple Horizons: Toward a Geography of Ocean-Space, The Professional Geographer, 51, 3, pp. 366-375
2. Geo-graphy and the power of representation: The geo-graphy of the ocean sea
Dividing (and naming) the ocean sea
Steinberg, P.E. (1999), Lines of divison, lines of connection: Stewardship in the world ocean, Geographical Review 89, 2, pp. 254-264
The East sea/ Sea of Japan case study
Chi Sang-Hyun, One feature, two names and many issues: The political geographies of naming the sea between Korea and Japan, eastsea1994.org/data/bbsData/14912842071.pdf
3. The “political geography of the sea”: the territorialisation of the sea
Territorial claims and islands disputes (Dokdo-Takeshima)
Suk Kyoon Kim (2008), Understanding Maritime Disputes in Northeast Asia: Issues and Nature, Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L., pp. 213-247
4. Geographical definitions and island disputes (Sankeku-Diaoyu)
McCormack G. (2013), Much Ado over Small Islands: The Sino-Japanese Confrontation over Senkaku/Diaoyu, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 11, 21, pp. 1-20
climate change and vanishing islands/reefs (Okininotori: a shima, or a reef’?)
Yamamoto L., Esteban M. (2010), Vanishing Island States and sovereignty, Ocean & Coastal Management 53, pp. 1–9
5. A classical approach to the geopolitics of the sea: the myth of sea power (A.T. Mahan)
Sumida J. (1999): Alfred Thayer Mahan, geopolitician, Journal of Strategic Studies, 22, 2-3, 39-62
China as a maritime power and the South China Sea competition
Nohara J.J. (2017) Sea power as a dominant paradigm: the rise of China’s new strategic identity, Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 6, 2, pp. 210-232
6. Sea power, sea nodes and islands as U.S. bases
The Hawai’i and Pearl Harbor, Midway and Wake, Guam
Vine D., (2015) Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World, Metropolitan Books, New York, Introduction, Capp. 1 and 2
7. Sea power, sea nodes and islands as overseas U.S. bases: bases of empire and lily pads
Guantanamo, Micronesia and Marshall Islands, Okinawa, Diego Garcia
Vine D., (2015) Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World, Metropolitan Books, New York, Cap 3.
8. LSMPAs (Large Scale Maritime Protected Areas): conservation or geopolitics?
Sand P.H. (2012), ‘Marine protected areas’ off UK overseas territories: comparing the South Orkneys Shelf and the Chagos Archipelago, The Geographical Journal, 178, 3, pp. 201–207
Leenhardt P., Cazalet B., Salvat B., Claudet J., Feral F. (2013). The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics? Ocean & Coastal Management, 85, pp. 112-118
9. Extra-territoriality 2: Cruising ships: Cruise tourism as an example of globalization? (History and Development, Crews, Employment, exploitation)
Semester
Second Semester
Assessment method
Marco Grasso
**Parte I - Geopolitics of deep oceans and environmental justice
Paper 2000-2500 and oral dicussions
Elena dell'Agnese
Parte II - Political geography of the sea
2,000-2,500 word paper on an issue analyzed during the course and selected by the instructor.
Office hours
Marco Grasso
by appointment, in person or online
Room U7/3117 third floor
Elena dell'Agnese
by appointment, in person or online; contact the lecturer on the e-mail address
Sustainable Development Goals
Key information
Staff
-
Elena Dell'Agnese
-
Marco Grasso