The final exam consists of a single written exam at the end of the course, with a score between 18-30 / 30, which comprises the discussion of various topics covered in the course, with an emphasis also on the connections between concepts and processes.

Assessment will be based on the following criteria:
(1) knowledge and understanding;
(2) ability to connect different concepts;
(3) autonomy of analysis and judgment;
(4) ability to correctly use scientific language.

Grade < 18
Knowledge and Understanding: The student only partially identifies the characteristics of the concepts. The connections between the concepts are fragmented and poorly supported by theoretical knowledge.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding: The student identifies only a few relevant elements in a phenomenon, unable to integrate them into a coherent analysis.
Communication and Argumentation Skills: In the written exam, the student develops a basic argument, lacking logical structure and characterized by numerous inaccuracies.
Learning, self-assessment, and self-regulation skills: The student is able to reconstruct only some aspects of their learning and professional development journey.

Grade 18-22
Knowledge and Understanding: The student recognizes and explains most of the conceptual features and is able to provide a relatively coherent explanation, albeit with some inaccuracies. References are present but not always rigorously.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding: The student is able to recognize a significant number of elements and provide a partial explanation, while highlighting some gaps in the analysis.
Communication and argumentation skills: In the written exam, the student constructs a basic argument, with a minimal structure but with some inaccuracies.
Learning, self-assessment, and self-regulation skills: The student demonstrates a basic awareness of their learning path, managing to draw essential connections between learning experiences, albeit with some inaccuracies.

Grade 23-27
Knowledge and Understanding: The student demonstrates a thorough understanding of conceptual characteristics.
In the oral exam, explanations are well-articulated and supported by an appropriate use of theoretical references.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding: The student accurately identifies the essential elements of a phenomenon. The application of knowledge occurs with methodological rigor that is not always solid.
Communication and argumentation skills: In the written exam, the student develops a coherent and well-organized argument, demonstrating good command of language and a solid logical-argumentative structure. Writing is clear and effective.
Learning, self-assessment, and self-regulation skills: The student analyzes his or her learning journey in a clear and structured manner, highlighting significant relationships between the various energy technologies and demonstrating a good capacity for critical reflection.

Grade 28-30
Knowledge and Understanding: The student demonstrates a thorough mastery of concepts, articulating complex connections and providing comprehensive explanations. Theoretical references are used with relevance and rigor.
Ability to apply knowledge and understanding: The student demonstrates an advanced ability to analyze a phenomenon, comprehensively identifying and interpreting all salient elements. Knowledge is applied with methodological rigor, supported by solid and detailed argumentation.
Communication and argumentation skills: In the written exam, the student develops a solid and detailed argument, with a rigorous logical structure and a high level of textual coherence. The presentation is fluent and well-structured.
Learning, self-assessment, and self-regulation skills: The student demonstrates an advanced capacity for self-reflection, developing a detailed and in-depth analysis of their learning and professional development journey. The connections between learning experiences and theoretical concepts are clear, coherent, and rigorous.